The cognitive iceberg

Every year the Edge website asks interesting people a provocative question. The Edge Question for 2011 is “What scientific concept would improve everybody’s cognitive toolkit?”

Adam Alter, a psychologist and Assistant Professor at Stern School of Business, NYU, responded with a short discussion of the idea that our minds are like an iceberg, such that we’re ignorant of many of the processes that shape our mental lives. This notion may be familiar – I’ve discussed my own model of the cognitive iceberg in this blog.

Alter explains that “while we’re focusing on the business of daily life, our brains are processing multitudes of information below the surface of conscious awareness”. This “peripheral information subtly shapes our thoughts, feelings and actions, and crafts some of our most critical life outcomes”.

He gives a few interesting examples, noting what a powerful impact the weather can have. No surprise perhaps that “rainy weather makes us more introspective and thoughtful”, but less obvious that it also improves our memory. Apparently the electrical state of the atmosphere also has an influence on accidents, suicide, depression and irritability.

Alter mentions the power of embodied metaphor, citing studies showing that “people find strangers more likable when they form their first impressions while holding a cup of warm coffee”. Lakoff and Johnson have discussed this at length, claiming that most of our reasoning relies on such embodied metaphors. The way we use the metaphor ‘more is up’ provides a simple example: Because in health we stand up, while sickness brings us down, we tend to think of ‘more’ as being ‘up’ (‘price rises’) and less as down (‘stocks plummeting’) (Lakoff & Johnson, 1999).

This entry was posted in Cognitive science and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The cognitive iceberg

  1. Pingback: Spirit of place: What lies beneath | Bodymind Place

  2. Pingback: Going wild in Scotland | Bodymind Place

  3. William Bendzick, Dover, NJ says:

    For Dr Adrian Harris:
    I have recently become interested in embodiment of “mind” so-called thru reading Lakoff and Johnson (1999). I will spare you my meanderings across the internet both prior and subsequent to L and J, by saying that my starting point was Bernard Lonergan’s seminal work “Insight” (Toronto: U of Tronto Press, 1957 et seq.) Lonergan (1904-1984) was so good that like Heideggar he has left a circle of disciples, both across Europe and North America (B.L. was a lifelong Canadian). Have you heard of Lonergan? Do you have colleagues or contacts in the Conitive Embodiment movement in any way who have studied Lonergan and see the connections between him and it? No kidding, they are there–ripe fruit for the picking…
    My best wishes to you,
    Bill Bendzick

  4. Administrator says:

    Hi William,
    I hadn’t heard of Lonergan, but having just checked out his entry on the Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, he certainly is worth investigating. See:

    I’ll ask round my contacts and let you know if anyone has explored his work.


  5. Administrator says:

    Hi William,
    I asked about Lonergan on the Embodiment discussion list and there was a short discussion. Don Hanlon Johnson had found Lonergan’s work especially useful. For more on Don, see his website:

    Don said that he thought Lonergan’s key value was in encouraging people to turn towards the realms of personal own experience. Don and those few others who commented agreed that Gendlin’s work was more valuable to future embodiment research. For more on Gendlin, see:


  6. Pingback: Eugene Gendlin | Bodymind Place

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *